@meimeiriver "moreover, in no case do I call a bad armored personnel carrier model, but only that neo-wastika". texture is not part of the "mod itself"?
@meimeiriver that is, you can ban me not for disagreeing, but for the fact that I gave the mod the wrong rating that you like. Isn't that the point of the rating system? why is it possible to downgrade for bugs, crashes and poor quality but not for offensive content? moreover, in no case do I call a bad armored personnel carrier model, but only that neo-wastika.
@meimeiriver@meimeiriver "The Z is an abbreviation of for victory (meaning "for victory"). Essentially no more a swastika than Churchill's V symbol"
It's just a convenient excuse. and by the way, the Nazis similarly used Z and V, which Russia is now repeating
@meimeiriver Please tell me why some people on the site were banned for supporting Nazism, while others were not? If I praised his armored personnel carrier with a swastika, you would not even say a word to me, but if I expressed disagreement, then you threaten me with a ban. GTAKorn's comment was also removed for mentioning the Hymars and their ability to destroy invaders' vehicles. Why is it so unfair?
@meimeiriver Dear moderators, do you understand that the symbolism depicted on the tank is tantamount to a swastika or any other symbol of genocide? The problem is not in color, not in the fact that it could have a Russian flag or inscriptions on it. The problem is in the symbolism and position of the author, who believes that the preview with the neo-swastika is better suited to his creation.
5mods on Discord
Yes, in Poland they really used the Mi-17, a little, but still. But if I'm not mistaken, they were replaced by S-70i Black Hawk
@meimeiriver "moreover, in no case do I call a bad armored personnel carrier model, but only that neo-wastika". texture is not part of the "mod itself"?
@meimeiriver that is, you can ban me not for disagreeing, but for the fact that I gave the mod the wrong rating that you like. Isn't that the point of the rating system? why is it possible to downgrade for bugs, crashes and poor quality but not for offensive content? moreover, in no case do I call a bad armored personnel carrier model, but only that neo-wastika.
@meimeiriver @meimeiriver "The Z is an abbreviation of for victory (meaning "for victory"). Essentially no more a swastika than Churchill's V symbol"
It's just a convenient excuse. and by the way, the Nazis similarly used Z and V, which Russia is now repeating
@meimeiriver Please tell me why some people on the site were banned for supporting Nazism, while others were not? If I praised his armored personnel carrier with a swastika, you would not even say a word to me, but if I expressed disagreement, then you threaten me with a ban. GTAKorn's comment was also removed for mentioning the Hymars and their ability to destroy invaders' vehicles. Why is it so unfair?
@meimeiriver Dear moderators, do you understand that the symbolism depicted on the tank is tantamount to a swastika or any other symbol of genocide? The problem is not in color, not in the fact that it could have a Russian flag or inscriptions on it. The problem is in the symbolism and position of the author, who believes that the preview with the neo-swastika is better suited to his creation.