I've checked the ZIP files and all of them are +- taken in the same in-game place, with the same in-game quality and in mostof them you can see a bit of a Trainer menu used to spawn the vehicles.
If you have any proof that justifies your ratings, show it, otherwise I'll remove them and warn you.
@Reyser Correct me If I am wrong but I will assume you checked the Zip files after he updated the mod 15Hrs ago - I gave that rating when the mod was initially released 2 Days ago (aka. reuploaded because he wanted to get rid of the negative ratings). I honestly don’t care if he now afterwards took the screenshots because he realised that he wouldn’t get far with stealing other people’s stuff.
If there is a rule on this forum that forces me to update my rating every time the modmaker updates his mod I will gladly change it. If not - the 0,5 stars will stay for the initial completely stolen mod and the pathetic try at reuploading it hoping people won’t realise.
That is false advertising and in my book worth 0,5 stars as well!
I admit I might be wrong since I didnt check the files of the first release - but from the screenshots you could tell that it was stolen again - and if his mod was indeed NOT stolen but he advertises it with old stolen screenshots than that is completely his fault and again, worth 0,5 stars IMHO.
@KrytonYT Still, you're downvoting it just because his old upload was with stolen screenshots. Is not worth to rate a mod with 0.5 stars just because the main picture is wrong. If a pic is wrong you can report it and we'll remove it or warn the author to change it, but you have no rights to down vote just because of a wrong pic on the upload page.
In resume: If you haven't downloaded a mod you shouldn't rate it, and less because it was uploaded before with stolen pics (when was uploaded in this page was solved) and without giving feedback that's related to the MOD, not to the upload page.
I don't know if you'll understand what I mean, but it's logical and that's how the site rules works.
@Reyser That doesn't answer my question - is there a rule that forces me to change my rating if a mod gets updated? If I rate XY Mod with 1 Star because it sucks - it then gets updated and doesn’t suck anymore a moderator can remove my rating?
Thats generally not how ratings work... (If I visit a restaurant - the food tastes crap - I give it a bad rating online - the cook gets fired - the food gets better - my rating is still valid and shouldn’t be removed. Because at the time the rating was made it was justified. JUST as an example)
And if someone uploads a completely garbage mod - advertises it with someone else’s screenshot that makes the mod LOOK ALOT BETTER then it actually is, its ok but downvoting a stolen mod is not ok?
But since I want to follow the rules I downloaded it and will rate it appropriately:
The pictures are very low quality, lacks AA and MSAA, on some angles and with some skins the cars are not clearly visible - even sometimes the bottom of the info menu can be seen. Next time invest some work and do the screenshots with proper quality in the rocktsar editor. The fact that you can see the menu popping up sometimes makes this seem utterly rushed without any care.
One last question: I clearly gave you the proof that the first screenshot is stolen and invalid - why is it still here?
You removed my rating (Which was in some way justified since I didnt rate the mod - I understand that) but you ignore a screenshot that is CLEARLY stolen? This is the same stuff as with Alex NSFW mod all over again - someone does clearly not follow the forum rules but it gets ignored until someone fills in a proper report. But the people negatively rating bad behaviour and stolen mods get attacked first... I am very well aware that you should rate the mod and not the person uploading it or the screenshots but you have to stay rational in somewhere...
There SHOULDN'T be the need to fill in a proper report if stuff is CLEARLY stolen or uploaded without permission like the first SS here or Alex NSFW mod. Your job should be to see that yourself without anyone filling in a 10 Page report with every single proof properly documented.
If this was the case - he would already be banned since his last mod that he removed because of the negative ratings - was 100% stolen.
The fact that this mod had two five star ratings 1 min ago shows how scared people are of moderators and how undemocratic and irrational the whole rating system is if there is so much influence taken on it.
@KrytonYT "is there a rule that forces me to change my rating if a mod gets updated?" The mod wasn't updated, was removed and then he uploaded a NEW one, because it's content wasn't the same. That makes your first rating here unfair.
"If I rate XY Mod with 1 Star because it sucks - it then gets updated and doesn’t suck anymore a moderator can remove my rating?" Yes, if the mod gets updated and it fixes the problems that were mentioned with bad ratings and the original users doesn't change them, we'll remove them. The restaurant example can't be compared, because you won't change your restaurant rating until you go there again.
The screenshot was still there because this is not my job and I spend the time I can to moderate this site. If you can't understand this, is your problem, not mine. I have a life and it's my priority.
AG_MODS changed his rating because he understood my argument when I've said I checked the file and there wasn't any problem with it, something that probably he didn't check before. About alex20121981 rating, I don't see why you're saying he did that because "he's one of the scared people". He's just an user that found it useful, judging his comment.
Also, did you see? I didn't remove your last comment even including a bad rating. That's because it includes real FEEDBACK, but anyway the rest of it's content is useless on this page.
From now, if you have any problem with Moderation, please make us a favour and talk directly to ADMINS like @Dark0ne. Every discussion should be with them, not with us.
5mods on Discord
please download then comment
im about to have a poo.....fort i would share that :)
@KrytonYT LMAO
@KrytonYT if u download it u will not say that i add original image from my pc
@MrBanana u can download and see screenshots
@KrytonYT @MrBanana @AG_MODS
I've checked the ZIP files and all of them are +- taken in the same in-game place, with the same in-game quality and in mostof them you can see a bit of a Trainer menu used to spawn the vehicles.
If you have any proof that justifies your ratings, show it, otherwise I'll remove them and warn you.
@Reyser Sorry for my mistake
@glmod
Great...!! i was waiting for it....!!
@Reyser Correct me If I am wrong but I will assume you checked the Zip files after he updated the mod 15Hrs ago - I gave that rating when the mod was initially released 2 Days ago (aka. reuploaded because he wanted to get rid of the negative ratings). I honestly don’t care if he now afterwards took the screenshots because he realised that he wouldn’t get far with stealing other people’s stuff.
If there is a rule on this forum that forces me to update my rating every time the modmaker updates his mod I will gladly change it. If not - the 0,5 stars will stay for the initial completely stolen mod and the pathetic try at reuploading it hoping people won’t realise.
And if that wasn't enough - the FIRST screenshot that advertises this mod still contains stolen pictures - one of million examples: left middle - "LWC63" - Stolen from here:
https://de.gta5-mods.com/vehicles/liberty-walk-mercedes-benz-c63-amg-add-on-template
That is false advertising and in my book worth 0,5 stars as well!
I admit I might be wrong since I didnt check the files of the first release - but from the screenshots you could tell that it was stolen again - and if his mod was indeed NOT stolen but he advertises it with old stolen screenshots than that is completely his fault and again, worth 0,5 stars IMHO.
@KrytonYT Still, you're downvoting it just because his old upload was with stolen screenshots. Is not worth to rate a mod with 0.5 stars just because the main picture is wrong. If a pic is wrong you can report it and we'll remove it or warn the author to change it, but you have no rights to down vote just because of a wrong pic on the upload page.
In resume: If you haven't downloaded a mod you shouldn't rate it, and less because it was uploaded before with stolen pics (when was uploaded in this page was solved) and without giving feedback that's related to the MOD, not to the upload page.
I don't know if you'll understand what I mean, but it's logical and that's how the site rules works.
@Reyser That doesn't answer my question - is there a rule that forces me to change my rating if a mod gets updated? If I rate XY Mod with 1 Star because it sucks - it then gets updated and doesn’t suck anymore a moderator can remove my rating?
Thats generally not how ratings work... (If I visit a restaurant - the food tastes crap - I give it a bad rating online - the cook gets fired - the food gets better - my rating is still valid and shouldn’t be removed. Because at the time the rating was made it was justified. JUST as an example)
And if someone uploads a completely garbage mod - advertises it with someone else’s screenshot that makes the mod LOOK ALOT BETTER then it actually is, its ok but downvoting a stolen mod is not ok?
______________________________________________________________________
But since I want to follow the rules I downloaded it and will rate it appropriately:
The pictures are very low quality, lacks AA and MSAA, on some angles and with some skins the cars are not clearly visible - even sometimes the bottom of the info menu can be seen. Next time invest some work and do the screenshots with proper quality in the rocktsar editor. The fact that you can see the menu popping up sometimes makes this seem utterly rushed without any care.
______________________________________________________________________
One last question: I clearly gave you the proof that the first screenshot is stolen and invalid - why is it still here?
You removed my rating (Which was in some way justified since I didnt rate the mod - I understand that) but you ignore a screenshot that is CLEARLY stolen? This is the same stuff as with Alex NSFW mod all over again - someone does clearly not follow the forum rules but it gets ignored until someone fills in a proper report. But the people negatively rating bad behaviour and stolen mods get attacked first... I am very well aware that you should rate the mod and not the person uploading it or the screenshots but you have to stay rational in somewhere...
There SHOULDN'T be the need to fill in a proper report if stuff is CLEARLY stolen or uploaded without permission like the first SS here or Alex NSFW mod. Your job should be to see that yourself without anyone filling in a 10 Page report with every single proof properly documented.
If this was the case - he would already be banned since his last mod that he removed because of the negative ratings - was 100% stolen.
The fact that this mod had two five star ratings 1 min ago shows how scared people are of moderators and how undemocratic and irrational the whole rating system is if there is so much influence taken on it.
waiting for more pic >>
@KrytonYT "is there a rule that forces me to change my rating if a mod gets updated?" The mod wasn't updated, was removed and then he uploaded a NEW one, because it's content wasn't the same. That makes your first rating here unfair.
"If I rate XY Mod with 1 Star because it sucks - it then gets updated and doesn’t suck anymore a moderator can remove my rating?" Yes, if the mod gets updated and it fixes the problems that were mentioned with bad ratings and the original users doesn't change them, we'll remove them. The restaurant example can't be compared, because you won't change your restaurant rating until you go there again.
The screenshot was still there because this is not my job and I spend the time I can to moderate this site. If you can't understand this, is your problem, not mine. I have a life and it's my priority.
AG_MODS changed his rating because he understood my argument when I've said I checked the file and there wasn't any problem with it, something that probably he didn't check before. About alex20121981 rating, I don't see why you're saying he did that because "he's one of the scared people". He's just an user that found it useful, judging his comment.
Also, did you see? I didn't remove your last comment even including a bad rating. That's because it includes real FEEDBACK, but anyway the rest of it's content is useless on this page.
From now, if you have any problem with Moderation, please make us a favour and talk directly to ADMINS like @Dark0ne. Every discussion should be with them, not with us.
aye
great